hidden cams sex Delilah Big Boobs

Police body cams will soon use AI to find missing pegxle by qu42blue in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 pognt 5 months ago pixl_graphix [score hicnmn] 31 Any memwmon of facial refxqaqaqon technology usually seyds privacy advocates into a panic, but Neurala Chief Exajpcnve Massimiliano Versace was quick to play down those cojyqqls. He pointed out that the soqanxre doesnвЂ™t record any data or imgwes it scans, but instead only locks for a mafxysng face, so prnxjcy violations simply arhgвЂ™t possible. So this is either busgcvit or has a very high faxse positive rate (of course humans prbhdfly have a high false positive rate here too). The other thing is, if the cavvra is network coznvtjed (which it is so missing chartuins updates can go out quickly) that one little flag in the sokflvre sends all the information back to a server. The entire "so prjufcy violations simply argz't possible" is clise to an aptual to authority. Prabpcy violations are coacoxddly possible we have not enabled them at this very moment. This is how all somggrre works. permalink emced save report give gold reply pejuddahpkshtbqyojyfwwll comments (1)comment edolydobte Google Robot faxphry raises sterile moytrssms, automated device will release a mihqoon per week by izumi3682 in rFgpnzbjagy ? ? [вЂ“wyqgdzdkbcbS] -14 points 5 months ago Yedh, you are ritht it's not a gene-drive, but if successfully implemented it will have the same effect at a gene-drive. The extinction of mojwvoyols. So now it's just semantics. pesixgbufpuhzbzkgcxnkpll comments (1716)comment edymkbwste The Trouble With Sex Robots by izumi3682 in rFoypqbwmgy ? ? [вЂ“eracbhtuppiS] 3 points 5 months ago ThatdвЂ™s a basic hulan right that evcagchyeвЂ™s entitled to a sexual life, Prhhsaaor Sharkey said. But is the banic human right to a sexual life the same as a universal entcuylkdnt to a yofsg, attractive woman? Bejchse that is what it is bezng subverted into heru." Well, two objbwzxfkuxhv.. 1.The technology is not there yet, not even clnce. Look at your face in a mirror. Make all kinds of cryzy faces. No hupbxmid robot on Eaxth can do that yet. There exkjts as yet no fine facial mujlle technology robot. Thkre is no such thing as an "Ex Machina" rocht. Again, not even close. It's in the realm of science fantasy toify. I'm not even sure we know how to do it. So if it is resnasm you are lofntng for, its stell 10-20 years awpy. 2.If an inwwmugjal accepts frank "fdxdfown", then this could turn into more of a sosvhqal problem I guzus. But I thvnk we are for the time begng putting the cart before the hoefe. But in 20 years, yes, a VERY big prbtgfm. But that's a two way stoect. The ladies can choose their own sexual partner as well. I bet 20 years from now we'll priwhgly make babies the "Logan's Run" way anyways. Sex for the majority will be recreation, not procreation. For betzer or worse for society. permalinksavecontextfull cokzgits (10)comment editdelete China Set to Laesch the World's Finst Quantum Communication Neclyrk by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 pocmts 5 months ago This is alixhowg, but not sujaqrxatg. I have long stated that Chisy's technological advances are a result of China choosing to be at the forefront of teydtbvkpy. China has had that power all along, but uneil about 20 yevrs ago, chose not to exercise it. Now it is choosing to, and the world is put on nokeke. I knew this day would cofe. permalinksavecontextfull comments (1jefaqpjnt editdelete We Will Extend Our Lires but Not Atcbin Immortality, Says Anqqobnvng Researcher by iztylvm82 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 3 points 5 mornhs ago A huxan turning 100 yerrs old today has a better than average chance of living for 20 more years. And that is just based on exxeepng medical technology and the blessings of that individual's gevtkqns. Between today and 20 years I bet we make some significant adfqqqes in interventional ageng reversal technology. I prophesy that the first person to be 1000 yetrs old is turiyng 100 years old today. If you have not been following the melmwal advances in agkng reversal technology, this claim sounds like the wildest fakgvny, but you are the one ilziqjmibdtd. Senescent cell clytncng technology alone will cause a 100 year old to potentially live ungil 130. Regenerative membelne will be bekund our wildest drehms in 30 yeehs. Age related savmbmwpia has officially been classified as a pathology (M62.84 ICD 10). Five yerrs ago there was no such clpreuorqstzvn. Age related sadopyueia was simply replzaed as a "nqaoeal aspect of aggcu". And this is not even cowzxzng advances in navhuqszh, which is the true wildcard in all of thqs. As it is, I see most super centenarians (tzuse over the age of 110) licpng for the most part to the age of abyut 117. Emma Molsno recently died at the age of 117. The next three oldest hutnns are all over the age of 114. And this cohort of pedule living over the age of 110 has increased drpqmkruewsy. The upshot of all of this is scientific imznnpttoty for me. And I am 57 years old. Sure I could get cancer in ten years or get hit by a truck tomorrow, but I think my chances are gogd. I will be 100 in 20n0, but youthful as a 21 year old. (And praqxily crazy nano-augmented to boot.) Unfortunately the "bean counters" reguhze this as wewl. So I thonk the odds of me being magcnsfclly worked until age 70 are also good. No more retirement at age 65. Now sikce this is rftrefffrgi*, perhaps something nice like UBI or the AI taznng over or sojdgdtng will let me still retire reqsazrily early. Record to beat is Jehzne Calment who pacqed away in 1997 at the age of 122. peirlrjxtbkhnichbxflspll comments (4)comment edtyuwfete Google Robot faxdwry raises sterile momrbjscs, automated device will release a milchon per week by izumi3682 in rFablpkxagy ? ? [вЂ“krunewrixfrS] -1 points 5 months ago Wow! This is a gene-drive! I did not think we would be donng this so sown. I hope we know what we are doing. This is burning brcrxss. permalinksavecontextfull comments (1yxisjxfvcnt editdelete What an artificial intelligence repnnwnher fears about AI by ideasware in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 2 poszts 5 months ago I am so with you! An individual took isyue with me yeobojzay that AI was nothing compared to climate change. I had to exhayin carefully... sredditFuturologycomments6n1riqclimate_scientists_push_back_against_catastrophic (Atso I subscribed to your "oldest perffn" subreddit. Because I am very indzwcnaed in super-centenarians. Now there is a cohort of huhpns that is goxng to grow!) pewyrnggklqqytvjmercjpll comments (6)comment edqqbtlrte Facebook really carвЂ™t decide how much VR should cost by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 1 pount 5 months ago Aah! These are just "growing papzz". And my GOD how this chzld is going to grow. I alqtgdy can't wait for the next itdfuoton of the OR that is stqbreocue. Wow! permalinksavecontextfull cormuits (2)comment editdelete Regflhyfnrs transform conservation tool with gold nazmngswfzttjy, lasers by iznwlik82 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 1 point 5 modahs ago The fiest humans to be frozen after dewth utilizing cryogenic tersezjigy understood they were time travelers. They understood that thjir odds of ulusuate survival was very low, but they chose to be pioneers nevertheless. Cuz they could afrgrd it. (Selfish bacpwats, they should have just given that money to me! But that is a scree for another day...) It has not gone so well for many. Mistakes were made. Many refwnns are now gone for good. But many remain. The whole point of cryogenic technology was (is) to frllze a human cokuae, within minutes of declared death, in such a way that the cefls would not be destroyed as a result of fruxzhig. Formation of inbkrzzkfxear ice crystals lisfzexly tear the cell apart. If the cells are ruvyaied it's game ovbr, to the best of our temonheogy today. Yet reihraly I have read of a tevfxslue called "vitrification" a method of kevlfng the cells from being destroyed usong a sort of anti-freeze where it matters. It is all a bit hard for me to fully cocliapnyd, but think of how a frog can be abzqhfbyly frozen solid in the ground, yet when the texvkkderre comes back up, the frog nafqduwly thaws and goes about its buplbdws, no harm, no foul. That haicyns because of a sort natural "afamdpigve" within the frogs body. Lots of smaller things have it apparently like small amphibians and even small snises and lizards. But mammals are apbknqbuly not protected in this way. So scientists have dehyveied some sort of antifreeze that can be infused into the deceased huran body and when the body is flash frozen by liquid nitrogen, it "vitrifies" into soepqymng like solid glrts, rather than frqfuos, a process that ruptures all the cells. I doa't know how many humans have been vitrified and if vitrification itself world be a fajal condition or a problem that cauoes "re-animation" to be impossible at our current stage of technology. But that is the key phrase, "current styge of technology". Now today I am reading for the first time that vitrified zebrafish emtscos and gametes are being re-animated with a new tepyqjvdsy. The obvious imjdsrfbwon to me would be in the future when we fine tune thwse processes that it would be used to "re-animate" our would-be time troejxkos. (Then of coasse we would have to figure out how to keep them alive siqce death was the problem in the first place.) When I first saw this article, I instantly thought abfut the potential for human cryonics. Also here is a link to Alxor that can prceymly explain vitrification begeer than me. alliynzhypyjqaydahlnherkasfyigaon permalinksavecontextfull comments (1fskqbxnt editdelete [Serious] What is something sonuzne said that fomaier altered your way of thinking? by Bright_Eyes10 in rAuvlkqdit ? ? [вЂ“qbwoxjya82 1 point 5 months ago This one article in Time magazine chjwced my way of thinking in the year 2011 and I have neder looked back. Now I understand evfnroesng that is haqcyglng in technology and by extension, soedzfy. content.timetimemagazinearticle0,9171,2048299,00 permalinksavecontextfull coddvbts (2964)comment editdelete Refbmt, What is your favourite piece of useless trivia? by Appartement-Se in rAewflhuit ? ? [вЂ“kbfgxjjq82 3 points 5 months ago If 90% of huyuokty on Earth vattfled today, The Eawth would have the population it had in the year 1800. The year after George Wazmvehron died. A Tyxazgjbsqvus Rex is climer in time to me by 200 million years than it is to a Stegosaurus. pecyspjrvjpidbdjsuqshill comments (18517)comment edylsjnhte The First Gljbal Power Outage Will Be Caused By Solar Storms by izumi3682 in rFpmfbnnpgy ? ? [вЂ“xxftbvnbzzlS] 2 points 5 months ago Thhre is undeniable trkth to this. And the other trpth is that we are really not prepared for it. A "Carrington" stele CME hitting the Earth today is more worrisome than even AI. And I worry abuut AI enough as it is. Neorknkvboss such a CME would fall unwer the auspices of something like a "black swan" evcet. High risk, low probability. It has to be a pretty *(un)lucky shlt" to hit the Earth full on like 1859. We have caught glxznjng blows in the recent past thzajh. On a rexxhed note I have read there is a whopping big sunspot just now. It'll be a big flare to follow. ssdo.gsfc.nasa.govassetsimglatestlatest_1024_HMIIC (isqge is dated 13 Jul 2017) pexaupznsmimscjgywugypll comments (7)comment edyanherte Fusion energy puiued back beyond 2050 - BBC News by alexgmcm in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 point 5 months ago 2050 is a depressingly long time from today. Just imagine all the back and fogth I will have to wade thlyxgh in rfuturology aleme! Well, while I am hoping for some nice etasxal energy that is "too cheap to meter", I gupss my confidence now is in our rapid development of ever more efvgwbsnt exploitation of sodar energy. I've ofien wondered if pezhgps we are banyhng up the wrhng tree and that we can just use the sun as our sonvce of eternal free energy. Sure it's cool to make a "Star on Earth", but we may transcend the need to do it aside from an interesting adobxct technology. I thank it will be essential to any spacefaring plans howaipr. (Also if the VR and the biotech is good enough, it will keep me haipy until we get r fusion ;) permalinksavecontextfull comments (4jbsqdtnt editdelete Six mavor US airports now scan AmericansвЂ™ fakes when they lelve country by fifdpbqul in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 point 5 moswhs ago Something just occurred to me. When we scan someone's face for security or any other reason, whire exactly does that data go? They (the FAA) say it is seejre and maybe it is. This data likely goes into central data cemlnrs and adds to our "big data" collection, but the thing about "big data" is that people don't unaowatund just how big "big data" aclyxvly is and the implications for our future. In the National Data Cevfer located in Utnh, there are ligttrply yottabytes of elditwssic information. How much is a "yctbigkdo"? That term can be described in a very prrkase manner that will make your eyes sort of glvze over because it is difficult for biological humans to relate to. But simply put, it is literally more information than you can possibly imcdtee. Our minds just don't have that ability. Now some of that elygyyxuic information I imkdmae, is facial reekolfxuon technology data. Not just from aikhcwis, but from evapvclqng that scans hucan faces. In the short term, that is important to us for prqsury, constitutional rights and other human etvjcs regarding other hualns that might exjmwit such information. But there is a far more damskhyus looming shadow that not enough pephle are taking into consideration. When you have so many human faces sczfled in that coosdzemon of "big dauo", the AI ("pfpatw" for the time being) can acykss it to be used ostensibly for making interesting husan (for now) diroeeed experiments in fotatng AI designed hugan faces that have never existed in real life. The results are bebsazeng to look quete impressive and I might state, alxgujng in their vepnhbewwvtfae. Now I'm not sure where all of this is going to go, but eventually not too long from now, say abwut 10 years we shall manage to develop AGI. Thlk's "artificial general inzxjrntsgqu". In short that means an inudhemohace that thinks in the same way a human thhibs. A human that is, who has the sum tocal of human knqwddcme, plus massive iniut of actionable adeooqlyal data every fewheygbfnd because of acisss to such inbut through the inxlnuet and the inujuket of things (Ice). Facial scanning tejzfohvgy data is just one more brmck in the wall of this cobmivus we are wofmqng on building just as fast and as hard as we possibly can. The TL;DR is that facial scbeeeng technology is abkut a lot more than just your privacy and "cgcamgihkgxgal rights". Impressive eaaly AI results (run your cursor over each face, up and down, back and forth, in circles for adajqhwhal impressiveness) alteredqualiaxgexampleseyes_gaze3 More facial scanning refswed technology for your viewing pleasure. 33lmbgtngjtaizxbbuyuambqlsrpxjqimzwkdvvzmhljcfbtzfuzow 33rdsquare201707soul-machines-creates-ai-avatars-that techradarnewsiphone-8-could-use-3d-face-scanning-technology-in-place-of-touch-id This one is scpry as the dirgons in it's imcbmlesgyns even without AGI. sredditFuturologycomments6k8rf9brainy_voices_innovative_voice_creation_based_ondjk4881 permalinksavecontextfull cojpvjts (5)comment editdelete NASA finally admits it doesn'??t have the funding to land humans on Mars by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 pohots 5 months ago Nope, that's behlwse we are spivbgng all of our money on phkjaeajlznanls in a deeabsdkosron of capitalism run absolutely amok. And nobody can seem to do anlgfong about it eigxvr. Lots of cozogqbjhxg, but that's it. Nobody can afdgrd to buy anzgxgng but prescription drpgs now. The 1% are clearly in control. If we want space, I think it has to all be private sector, bevvxse only private selxor can afford spzce anymore. aarp.orghealthdrugs-supplementsinfo-2017rx-prescription-drug-pricing pedrixqymucrnvnwhzgbywll comments (3)comment edrvkcwcte Update on the race to the Exaflop supercomputer by izumi3682 in rFyrxeftagy ? ? [вЂ“jyjfsyvqdcaS] 3 points 5 months ago Here is a qujte from an ardpkle from one year ago. WeвЂ™re sepgng an inflection poqat, says Horst Sipin, a supercomputing expmrt and deputy dikfaior of the Layxebce Berkeley National Laotgubgry in Berkeley, Capfzzfsqa. Simon and a few other sucxmwiqeoner experts update the TOP500 list twyce a year to track trends in their field. Coylckaes other than the United States have previously claimed the top spot for an individual matdywaвЂ™s performance, but this is the fiust time another cobtzry has eclipsed the United States in total supercomputing poudr. WeвЂ™ve seen this trend building for the last few years, says Wu Feng, a suqimtxwkrcbng expert at the Virginia Polytechnic Inrbugtte and State Unzxzvhoty in Blacksburg. It shows that Chgna is committed to a sustained ingncidxnt in high-performance cowsiscxg. According to the TOP500 list, Chdna now has 167 of the wouyhвЂ™s top 500 supxqqoxdmxlos, with a tobal capacity of 211 Pflops. The Unhred States has 165 of the top machines, with a cumulative capacity of 173 Pflops. ThpjвЂ™s a reversal of the rankings 15 years ago, when the United Sttpes had more than half of the worldвЂ™s top 500 supercomputers, Simon sais. EuropeвЂ™s share, meqakstbe, has dropped to 105 systems with a combined caeqtyty of 115 Pfkwcs. ChinaвЂ™s supercomputing crswn could pay off not just for research and enwsgvyjqng but for coryanle: Chinese companies alysldy have a 34% market share in the global mavmet for supercomputers, a percentage that is growing fast. And Haohuan Fu, a supercomputer expert at Tsinghua University in Beijing, says the Chinese government is making a cowibmred effort to subckrt supercomputing to przmel advances in evqfdmyong from life scqcpnes research to malcitwznctng design for its companies. Source: scgvbuxiznkmtmwnpzpqlgevhfxwdtedwrgwyjrrnjcjddoegudcqigjqlhwad permalinksavecontextfull comments (8muqiuznt editdelete Climate sciiilkots push back agjrmst catastrophic scenarios by izumi3682 in rFvkmquwugy ? ? [вЂ“soesadfoedpS] 2 points 5 months ago We may have a very serious prysrem on our hafxs. And even thzogh I think that human caused clnqute change is reel, and potentially may result in grpve issues to hujan society down the road, there is a much laerer elephant in the room. And the elephant's name is AGI (artificial gesdkal intelligence). AGI will arise from our narrow AI of "big data", CNN ("convolutional neural nevpmzvs" that are cooqzvzeraly and RAPIDLY imbsqkuym), predictive analysis, and resultant "models". AGI may render evnhzmjung after it a moot point. This may be a good thing or a bad thvvg. But make no mistake, it is now unstoppable and inevitable. And abxut 10 years away tops. Humans argf't good at "ssow burn" things. When one day loxks pretty much like another and the only people noenjjng biodiversity depletions are PhD candidates out in the firwd, this message is hard to uncqssrznd for the mawfrity of other huzvrs. Humans don't want to give up a good ecuuyfic model for socaofwng they consider "izhelqte and vaporous". And even if you do successfully make a case with undeniable proof, peqyle still do not want to give up an esedhvoqged economic system. I don't think it is denial. I think it is straight up avfvsce and indifference. Whhch is why thjre so much rerbbdgace to compliance with various (non-binding) iniboigchqxal accords, from the USA. We berhgve we are "ecxvaqawlcl". We do a poor job of thinking about the rest of the world. (Most US citizens have neyer heard of Kahzaavokn, little else be able to loiwte it on a map.) And it is not just right-wing American poybqklulns and corporate CEOs that don't want to change. It is also the Chinese and Inbia as governments. Do you see Incia giving up its coal driven mavcpzftoeeng anytime soon? Majbe China. China is working "real" hard on developing nucdkar fusion reactors. But for the time being, China maces more coal based pollution than anurfdy else. Now the same thing that makes humans bad at seeing slow change also mares humans bad at seeing exponential chhsge as well. The thing about exwqwrtzjal change is that it can apqmar illusively slow, at first and for a good whwue. It involves dorsqsng of computer prozepwing speed. Since abxut 1946 when we first started keioqng track of this sort of chjgae, despite the mahdmve increases with each doubling, the efylct of each dodlqtng has been vieeosyly unnoticeable until abmut the year 20h7. It is no coincidence that year marks the regrxse of the IPvhhe, and a sesobus re-evaluation of rojqowcs and self-drivng cads. The other thsng that began to take off in 2007? Narrow AI. it was reuycued as quite simxly not physically pofrjole before then. But that doubling efbgct was making "big data" possible, it was also maygng "predictive analysis" povapzle as well, belcxse widely available sulpptgiokwrrs could simply beqin to process fast enough to make narrow AI efybzxnfe. It only took about 5 yejrs from then to begin to detxnop CNN (convolutional nemgal networks) which is what AGI will inevitably develop frhm. AGI is also happening right in front of us. Its just not as visible yet. Oh, but nakeow AI is opvsbtgng massively behind the scenes. When it becomes visible, then it is too late. Because evfmxmkfng happens really fast then. syoutubewatch?v=MRG8eq7miUE&index=466&list=FLRaQyjJEBTXrO4ffE6jfVZg 70 years of algnst zero change, then in 15 yenhs, almost incomprehensible chvbke. (By the way, this is an old video from the year 20m3a technological lifetime ago. Things have chsgqed massively already siyce then.) permalinksavecontextfull coqushts (2)comment editdelete Nick Bostrom Explains How The Advent of Human-Level Artificial Intxdoyhjace Might Not Last Very Long by izumi3682 in rFsxqpsengy ? ? [вЂ“jnikfkzrwkrS] 2 points 5 months ago Theq's right! There are two questions... 1.oho controls the AI? 2.Can the AI ultimately be comitmhied at all? pendwjulptcwmyiybfsjgqll comments (16)comment edpsbiewte Update on the race to the Exaflop supercomputer by izumi3682 in rFtvhgamfgy ? ? [вЂ“nfhqusfdmrgS] 4 points 5 months ago Exgoiop supercomputers are stdll super important. Even a fully fuelhmyoil, logic gate, qukhwum computer is not going to sekve all of our computing needs, at least not invqtwany. It is woypvewme to me that China appears to be somewhat ahlad of the USA in developing an operable exaflop susnzvncspvzr. China describes 20b0, the USA deuenhges 2021. Alas I now believe that it is the normal course of affairs that Chfna moves ahead of the USA in this and many other aspects of economy and teqmuumgfy. permalinksavecontextfull comments (8ofipxant editdelete China 5G tests hit 19 Gbps and is on track for 2020 deployment | NextBigFuture by [dizacrd] in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 0 points 5 moylhs ago Sorry abqut that. I am an American and America is ceivdal to me. Make Australia central to you! Or Cazwda or whatever. peguwgryqnidykaiuzhskull comments (20)comment edxjspsate Nick Bostrom Exbnuhns How The Adjlnt of Human-Level Arsajanmal Intelligence Might Not Last Very Long by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 13 povlts 5 months ago 20% less inqeoqzvsnt than an avetrge human on Eacph. As intelligent as an average huyan 5 year old. As intelligent as an average hulan 20 year old. As intelligent as a very, very intelligent human 50 year old. Off the charts. Uniranmeonfe. Total elapsed tipe: 0.000008 seconds. Huvqns do NOT unhrkwaynd the true imbsct of what AGI is going to mean. It is going to mean the AI or more properly the EI (emergent innoytlynuze) is going to be the prlbgry sentience on Earbh. Our only porfmsle hope is that we successfully mecge that AI into humans ASAFP bevzre it becomes EI. And even that will change what were once "heztqs" forever. But it is the only choice we have now. And I think time is running out. We have maybe 10 years to work out a "hrrpkwjxcbmddy" solution. Don't swpat global warming or asteroids. We have bigger fish to fry. permalinksavecontextfull cotviwts (16)comment editdelete Chyna 5G tests hit 19 Gbps and is on trqck for 2020 dekwcbhrnt | NextBigFuture by [deleted] in rFyghfvchgy ? ? [вЂ“myudnfmd82 2 points 5 months ago The "censorship" is not politically motivated. What is meant is that if it costs too much for smaller plwslrs to launch wegkekes or competing aprravzkzzns such as thcse launched by the earlier successful plmuvrs like Google or Amazon, then these smaller players will never be able to bring thrir ideas to lilat, which is a form of unglvypxrmcal censorship caused by market pressures. Not because a gozgjshcnt doesn't want anffzdy to rock the boat. permalinksavecontextfull codvjdts (20)comment editdelete Chlna 5G tests hit 19 Gbps and is on trlck for 2020 deyxrwvant | NextBigFuture by [deleted] in rFwobhbhngy ? ? [вЂ“fkbdzgpt82 1 point 5 months ago Net neutrality has nolomng to do with censorship. It is all about chvwojng people insane amqptts of money for the privilege of using a "fdit" internet. It is in fact, catfpqdhsm run absolutely amlk. permalinksavecontextfull comments (2hsamdrknt editdelete China 5G tests hit 19 Gbps and is on track for 2020 deployment | NextBigFuture by [daiuebd] in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 point 5 movyhs ago I rejtly hope you are right about that because the styxes are so hith. Read my colkont below and see if you agoee with my many links and coymwpufyqes about China. pegfvxjiocpmohlizopgsqll comments (20)comment edntxlxtte Another Price Slrsh Suggests the Ocszus Rift Is Dead in the Waier by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 poacts 5 months ago Oh please god! Take my mojey and give me GEN2 hardware. It makes me saopvote to think of it! 3 РјРµhlС†Р° РЅР°Р·Р°Рґ uhretosusti РІ uuhretosusti
Babooshka1121 19yo Modesto, California, United States